SB 164-FN-A-LOCAL - VERSION ADOPTED BY BOTH BODIES

5/9/01 1113s

6/26/01 1827cofc

2001 SESSION

01-0824

04/09

SENATE BILL 164-FN-A-LOCAL

AN ACT establishing a comprehensive statewide accountability system concerning an adequate education.

SPONSORS: Sen. O'Hearn, Dist 12; Rep. Kurk, Hills 5

COMMITTEE: Education

AMENDED ANALYSIS

This bill establishes criteria for measuring school performance standards, requires the development of a local education improvement and assessment plan in each school district, defines satisfactory progress in school performance areas, and establishes an education improvement fund in the department of education which shall be funded by a transfer from the education trust fund in the amount of $2,500,000 for the biennium ending June 30, 2003. The bill also clarifies the process for conducting hearings before local school boards on the issue of nonrenomination of teacher contracts and for the appeal of such nonrenomination decisions to the state board of education.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Explanation: Matter added to current law appears in bold italics.

Matter removed from current law appears [in brackets and struckthrough.]

Matter which is either (a) all new or (b) repealed and reenacted appears in regular type.

5/9/01 1113s

6/26/01 1827cofc

01-0824

04/09

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand One

AN ACT establishing a comprehensive statewide accountability system concerning an adequate education.

Be it Enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court convened:

1 Statement of Purpose. The general court finds that in order to ensure a balance between education improvement and assessment and an adequate public education, it is necessary to establish a comprehensive, statewide educational accountability system that shall include:

I. Statewide performance goals for all pupils.

II. Statewide systematic measurement of school performance at the state and local levels using multiple valid measures.

III. Reporting on pupil performance at the school, school district, and state levels.

IV. The development, implementation, and evaluation, with broad input from community teams, of local education improvement and assessment plans designed to meet state goals and other criteria for making progress, and any performance goals developed locally to meet identified educational needs.

V. The opportunity for schools that are not making satisfactory progress toward statutory performance goals to receive assistance from the state.

2 New Chapter; School Performance and Accountability. Amend RSA by inserting after chapter 193-F the following new chapter:

CHAPTER 193-G

SCHOOL PERFORMANCE AND ACCOUNTABILITY

193-G:1 Definitions. In this chapter:

I. "Commissioner" means the commissioner of the department of education.

II. "Department" means the department of education.

III. "NHEIAP" means the New Hampshire education improvement and assessment program as established under RSA 193-C.

193-G:2 Statewide Performance Goals. A school should meet, exceed, or make satisfactory progress as defined in this section, for each of the following performance goals:

I. All pupils should, at a minimum, perform at grade level on the reading component of the statewide assessment administered in grade 3 pursuant to RSA 193-C:3.

(a) For pupils with disabilities who qualify for the alternate version of the statewide assessment, performance at the adequate level shall be based on the communication component of the alternate assessment.

(b) For pupils whose native language is other than English and whose English language reading ability prevents them from participating in the statewide assessment, school districts, in conjunction with the department, should make a reasonable effort to provide an alternate assessment of each pupil's reading ability in the pupil's native language. If an alternate assessment is provided, the school district shall report pupil performance to the department of education for inclusion in school, district, and state third grade reading reports. If it is not feasible to administer the assessment in the pupil's native language, then the pupil may be excused from the assessment.

II. Pupils should, at a minimum, perform at the basic and above levels in the designated academic areas assessed on the statewide tests administered at the following grades in accordance with RSA 193-C at the following rates:

(a) 70 percent in English language arts in grade 3.

(b) 70 percent in mathematics in grade 3.

(c) 70 percent in English language arts in grade 6.

(d) 70 percent in mathematics in grade 6.

(e) 55 percent in science in grade 6.

(f) 65 percent in social studies in grade 6.

(g) 70 percent in English language in grade 10.

(h) 60 percent in mathematics in grade 10.

(i) 55 percent in science in grade 10.

(j) 50 percent in social studies in grade 10.

(k) The most recent 3-year rolling averages shall be used to determine if a school is meeting the academic-area statewide assessment performance goals that apply to it, except that if 3-year rolling averages are not available for a particular school, either 2-year averages or, if 2-year averages are not available, a single year's data shall be used for this purpose.

III. Pupils should, at a minimum, attend school at the following rates:

(a) 95 percent for elementary schools.

(b) 94 percent for middle schools and junior high schools.

(c) 92 percent for high schools.

(d) The appropriate grade-range attendance rate collected by the department at the district level shall be used as the school attendance rate in districts that have multiple schools at a particular grade range.

IV. The percentage of pupils who drop out of school annually should not exceed the following rates:

(a) 0.5 percent for middle schools and junior high schools.

(b) 5 percent for high schools.

(c) The department shall calculate and report the annual dropout rate as a percentage based on the reported number of pupils who dropped out of school and did not return during a one year period as compared to the total school population.

V. The percentage of graduating pupils who go on to post-secondary education or military service should be at least 66 percent.

VI. Each school shall comply with the applicable standards for school approval adopted by the state board pursuant to RSA 21-N:9, I.

VII. "Satisfactory progress" means that for each school, the most recent 3-year rolling average shall be an improvement over the prior year's 3-year rolling average, except that if a 3-year rolling average is unavailable for a particular school, either a 2-year average or, if a 2-year average is unavailable, 2 adjacent year's data shall be used for this purpose. The use of a 3-year rolling average shall not be required for the first 2 years in which satisfactory progress is being measured.

VIII. On May 1, 2005, and annually thereafter, the commissioner shall determine if a school has demonstrated that it is making satisfactory progress toward, or has met or exceeded the performance goals established in this section. The criteria to be used to determine if a school is making satisfactory progress shall be established as follows:

(a) Not later than May 1, 2002, and every 3 years thereafter, based on generally accepted statistical procedures, the commissioner in conjunction with the state board of education shall determine and publish the criteria for making satisfactory progress in each of the areas established in paragraphs I-V. In making these determinations, consideration shall be given to the effect of school and grade-level enrollments and other relevant demographic data on the validity and comparability of the data collected and, to the extent feasible, the performance of discrete subgroups of pupils, including pupils with disabilities, limited English proficient pupils, and low income pupils.

(1) Satisfactory progress in meeting the reading performance goal established in paragraph I shall be based on the average of the mean-scaled scores obtained on the reading component of the grade 3 statewide assessment administered in accordance with RSA 193-C:3, IV(i). If a primary school does not include grade 3, then reading performance shall be based on the performance of the pupils from that school who attend grade 3 in the elementary school attended by the majority of the pupils from said primary school.

(2) Satisfactory progress in meeting the NHEIAP performance goals established in paragraph II shall be based on the mean-scaled scores obtained in the academic areas assessed at each grade level. If a school does not include a grade assessed in NHEIAP, then NHEIAP performance shall be based on the performance of the pupils from that school who attend the next highest NHEIAP grade level assessed in the school attended by the majority of the pupils from the school that does not include a grade assessed in NHEIAP.

(3) Satisfactory progress in meeting the performance goals established in paragraphs III-V shall be based on the rolling 3-year averages of performance in these areas.

(b) A school shall be considered to be making satisfactory progress in meeting the school approval standards specified in paragraph VI, if it either has been conditionally approved or granted a delay in full compliance by the state board.

IX. On May 1, 2005, and annually thereafter, the commissioner shall compile and disseminate to the governor and council, the general court, the state board, local school board chairpersons, superintendents of schools, school principals, and the public, a list of schools that are not making satisfactory progress in meeting the statewide performance goals set forth in RSA 193-G:3.

X. No later then January 1, 2006, and every 3 years thereafter, the state board shall submit to the education committees of the house and senate a report outlining the results of the state board's review of the performance goals established in paragraphs I-VI together with any recommendations to the general court for changes in these goals that have been adopted by a majority of the state board. In conducting its review, the state board shall consider the statistical validity and comparability of using additional performance data collected at the school and district levels.

193-G:3 Aid to Schools.

I. A school district that is unable to meet or make satisfactory progress toward the statewide performance goals in RSA 193-G:2 may request assistance from the department of education, including financial assistance from the local education improvement assistance program established in RSA 193-G:4, for any school within the district. If a school district that is unable to make satisfactory progress toward meeting the statewide performance goals in RSA 193-G:2 does not request assistance, the department of education may initiate such review as it deems appropriate and, on the basis of such review, offer its assistance to the school district, but the school district shall not be required to accept such assistance.

II. A school district may request up to 3 years of assistance. A detailed plan and budget shall be submitted to the department of education. The department may offer aid in developing the plan and budget.

III. If a school district specified on the list required under RSA 193-G:2, IX has not submitted a request for assistance then, in a town, a warrant article may be presented to the school district governing body, in accordance with applicable statutory requirements in effect in the town for the petitioning of a warrant article, or, if in a city maintaining a school department within its corporate organization, a resolution may be offered to the governing body in accordance with applicable statutory requirements in effect in the city for offering a resolution, to direct the school district governing body to submit a request for assistance pursuant to this section. If a majority of the legislative body in the city or town votes in favor of requesting assistance, then that assistance shall be requested and provided in accordance with RSA 193-E:6.

IV. The department of education shall evaluate and approve proposals based on their efficacy, as determined by a cost-benefit analysis, and the extent to which school district revenues are insufficient to implement the proposed activity without adverse educational consequences.

V. Until the publication of the list pursuant to RSA 193-G:2, IX, a school district may request assistance from the department, including financial assistance from the local education improvement assistance program established in RSA 193-G:4, for any school within the district.

VI. Priority shall be given to lower-performing schools.

193-G:4 State Assistance to Local School Districts; Education Improvement Fund Established.

I. There is hereby established an education improvement fund in the department of education for the purpose of providing assistance to local school districts. This fund shall be non-lapsing and shall be administered by the department. For the biennium beginning July 1, 2001 and ending June 30, 2003, the sum of $2,500,000 shall be transferred from the education trust fund to the education improvement fund. In order to satisfy this obligation, the governor is authorized to draw a warrant from the education trust fund to satisfy the provisions of this paragraph.

II.(a) The department is authorized to use the amount transferred to the education improvement fund for the following purposes within the following expenditure limits:

(1) For the biennium ending June 30, 2003, an amount not to exceed $500,000 to implement and administer the pupil achievement assessment pilot program established in this act.

(2) For the biennium ending June 30, 2003, an amount not to exceed $225,000 to collect, analyze, and report the demographic and educational improvement data.

(3) For the biennium ending June 30, 2003, an amount not to exceed $275,000 to implement and administer the grade 3 reading assessment program set forth in RSA 193-C:3, IV(i).

(4) For the biennium ending June 30, 2003, an amount not to exceed $75,000 for contracted assistance to study the capacity of the department of education to provide support to local schools.

(5) For the biennium ending June 30, 2003, an amount not to exceed $780,000 to assist local school staff with the analysis and use of school performance data, and to implement local educational improvement and assessment plans.

(6) For the biennium ending June 30, 2003, an amount not to exceed $645,000 for providing grants to school districts, provided that any amounts set forth in subparagraphs (a)(1)-(a)(5) which are unexpended as of June 30, 2003, shall be used by the department to make grants to school districts under this section.

(b) For the biennium beginning July 1, 2001 and ending June 30, 2003, appropriations from the fund shall be authorized at the class level by the legislative fiscal committee and the governor and council. For the biennium beginning July 1, 2003, and each biennium thereafter, appropriations from the fund at the class level shall be included in and authorized as part of the department's biennial operating budget.

(c) Moneys transferred to the education improvement fund shall not be transferred, diverted, or used for any purpose not specified in this section.

193-G:5 Powers of the Department of Education and State Board of Education. Notwithstanding RSA 186:5, the powers of the department and the state board relative to school performance and accountability shall be limited to the provisions of RSA 193-G:1 - 193-G:4.

3 New Subparagraphs; Statewide Education Improvement and Assessment Program; Program Goals Amended. Amend RSA 193-C:3, IV by inserting after subparagraph (h) the following new subparagraphs:

(i) At the end of grade 3, to determine if pupils are reading at grade level on a standardized reading test to be chosen by the department with the approval of the state board of education.

(j) At the school, district, and state levels, to provide performance reports on specific subgroups of pupils as required by federal law and regulations, including performance reports on pupils with disabilities, educationally disadvantaged pupils, and vocational education pupils.

4 Pupil Achievement Assessment Pilot Program Established.

I. The department of education, in consultation with the state board of education and the school administrative unit superintendents, shall establish a 4-year pupil achievement assessment pilot program in 10 selected school districts which represent a cross section of the state for the school years 2001-2002 through 2004-2005. Participation in the pilot program shall be voluntary. The pilot program shall examine the use of standardized achievement tests for pupils in grades 4 through 9 in each of the selected pilot schools as well as other techniques to measure pupil achievement over time. The purpose of the pilot program is to identify multiple measures of pupil achievement and to analyze such data from those measures to assess the extent to which such data yields valid and comparable information on the average annual rate of gain or value-added. In addition, the program would provide for a so-called gains-based statistical analysis of data collected in years 2-4 of the program for each pupil, school, and district. Upon the collection of multiple years of data, an analysis of such data may be performed to measure the average gain or value-added to an individual pupil over the course of the measurement period.

II. After 3 years, the state board of education in conjunction with the legislative oversight committee established under RSA 193-C:7 shall evaluate the potential value of the information collected under the pilot program and consider the merits of the approaches used in the pilot program to determine whether such approaches may be used as additional or alternative methods of measuring educational achievement and success.

5 Reporting on Pupil Performance. RSA 193-E:3 is repealed and reenacted to read as follows:

193-E:3 Reporting on the Delivery of Education.

I. By August 1, 2001, and annually thereafter, each school district shall report to the department of education data at the school and district levels for the previous school year on the following indicators, provided however, that the department shall develop a reasonable schedule to phase-in the reporting of data that is not being collected systematically during school year 2000-2001:

(a) Numbers and percentages of pupils with disabilities, limited English proficient pupils, pupils in advanced placement programs, and pupils eligible for free or reduced-price meals.

(b) Pupil mobility rates calculated as the percentages of pupils who transfer into or out of a school each year. These percentages shall not include pupils who enter the school on opening day at the lowest grade in the school or pupils who leave the school upon completion of the highest grade in the school.

(c) Attendance and dropout rates.

(d) Performance on statewide tests administered pursuant to RSA 193-C:3, IV(i) including the percentage of pupils reading at grade level on the reading component of the grade 3 statewide educational assessment and performance on any other standardized tests administered at local option.

(e) Percentage of graduating pupils going on to post-secondary education and military service.

(f) Average class size for instructional purposes at the primary, intermediate, and secondary levels as of October 1.

(g) Number and percentage of educators teaching one or more courses outside of the educator's certification area and the percentage of all courses being taught by educators outside their certification area.

(h) Teacher and administrator turnover rates at the school and district levels.

II. By August 1, 2001, and annually thereafter, each school district shall report to the department of education data at the school and district levels for the previous school year any other data required by federal law on the same or similar subject matter specified in subparagraphs I (b) - (g) or for any of the subgroups set forth in subparagraph I (a).

III. The department of education, with the approval of the legislative oversight committee established in RSA 193-C:7, may implement and report data on any additional indicators deemed relevant to the purposes of this section.

IV. In order to reduce school districts' administrative time and costs, the department of education shall develop and utilize user-friendly, computer forms and programs to collect the data set forth in paragraph I as well as all enrollment and cost data related to determining the cost of an adequate education The department shall request funds as part of its biennial operating budget to develop, update, and maintain the required forms and programs.

V. Not later than December 1, 2001, and annually thereafter, the department of education shall issue a public report on the condition of education statewide and on a district-by-district and school-by-school basis. This report shall be entitled "New Hampshire School District Profiles." It shall include demographic and pupil performance data including, but not limited to, district and school performance on state tests administered pursuant to RSA 193-C, all other data provided under paragraph I, as well as other relevant statistics as determined by the department of education. Comparisons with state averages shall be provided for data reported under subparagraphs I(a)-(h). Comparisons of each district and school to itself based on its own performance for the prior school year and its most recent 3-year rolling averages shall be provided for data reported under subparagraphs I(c)-(e). Statewide rankings of each district and school shall be provided for data reported under subparagraphs I(c)-(e), including a statewide ranking of each school and school district based on the percentage increase of improvement as compared with the same school district's performance in the previous year. The report shall be organized and presented in a manner that is easily understood by the public and that assists each school district with the identification of trends, strengths, and weaknesses and the development of its local school education improvement and assessment plan.

VI. Each school district shall provide an opportunity for public discussion of the report at a meeting of its governing body. The school district shall make the report available to the public at least 10 days prior to the meeting.

VII. No later then January 1, 2003, the department of education shall prepare and submit to the education committees of the house and senate a plan for collecting and evaluating data to determine the correlation between level of academic performance and such factors as pupils' gender, socioeconomic status, cost per pupil, class size, teacher qualifications, and use of various instructional strategies as well as an in-depth study of community members' perceptions of their involvement in education and of important educational issues. The plan shall include an estimate of the costs to the department and local school districts of collecting, analyzing, and reporting the results of these studies.

6 Statewide Education Improvement and Assessment Program; Local Education Improvement and Assessment Plans. RSA 193-C:9, I is repealed and reenacted to read as follows:

I.(a) Each school district shall be responsible for coordinating the development and implementation of a local education improvement and assessment plan. The plan shall be evaluated and reviewed annually and shall be included in the school district's annual report. The development and implementation of the plan and the annual evaluation and review shall be carried out with input from administrators, teachers, parents, employers, and other community members. The plan shall be approved by the local school board no later then October 31, 2003. At a minimum, each plan shall identify and set forth objectives for the school or each school in the district to achieve, including:

(1) Objectives and annual benchmarks for improved pupil performance in each of the statewide performance goals.

(2) Local assessment measures which focus on individual student performance.

(3) The use of local and statewide assessment results to improve instruction and enhance student learning.

(4) Methods for reporting the results of all assessment measures.

(5) Strategies to promote family and community involvement.

(6) Procedures detailing how the school district budget reflects the goals of the plan.

(b) Each plan may include the following elements:

(1) Curriculum and proficiency standards.

(2) School and district performance goals based on reported data on educational indicators listed in paragraph II of this section.

(3) Procedures for aligning curriculum and instructional practices.

(4) Role of support services and programs.

(5) Role of instructional leadership.

(6) Staff supervision and evaluation and performance-based professional development.

(7) Pupil behavior and conduct codes.

(8) Provisions for addressing individual school needs.

7 Statewide Education Improvement and Assessment Program; Local Education Improvement and Assessment Plans. RSA 193-C:9, IV is repealed and reenacted to read as follows:

IV. The department of education shall develop a model local education improvement and assessment plan which can be used by school districts. The model plan shall:

(a) Identify and set forth objectives for the school or each school in the district to achieve, including objectives and annual benchmarks for improved pupil performance in each of the applicable areas in which statewide performance goals have been established.

(b) Identify areas where improvements are needed immediately.

(c) Specify how the school or each school in the district will work to make improvements in the combined performance of all pupils enrolled in a school as well as the performance of discrete subgroups of pupils, including pupils with disabilities, limited English proficient pupils, and low income pupils.

(d) Specify the methods and assessments to be used in addition to NHEIAP assessments for the annual evaluation and review of the plan, including data to be collected, analyzed, and reported. This shall include the data specified in RSA 193-E:3, I as well as additional data determined locally.

8 Legislative Oversight Committee; Duties Amended. Amend RSA 193-C:8 to read as follows:

193-C:8 Duties of the Legislative Oversight Committee; Report. The oversight committee shall:

I. [The oversight committee shall review] Review the development and implementation of the program to ensure that they are in accordance with legislative policy. Implementation of the program shall be in conjunction with the committee's review.

II. Review all of the provisions of RSA 193-G and submit a report of such review every 2 years after the effective date of this section to the speaker of the house of representatives, the president of the senate, the governor, and the chairpersons of the house and senate education committees.

III. Prepare any legislation that is needed as a result of the review of the progress and results of the policies implemented under this chapter.

IV. Identify operational principles which should guide the work of the department of education in supporting improved school performance and accountability.

V. Analyze existing department of education programs and initiatives which support improved school performance and accountability and determine the necessity of enhancing such programs and initiatives, if deemed necessary.

9 School Money; Education Trust Fund Amended. Amend the introductory paragraph of RSA 198:39, I to read as follows:

198:39 Education Trust Fund Created and Invested.

I. The state treasurer shall establish an education trust fund in the treasury. Moneys in such fund shall not be used for any purpose other than to distribute adequate education grants to municipalities' school districts pursuant to RSA 198:42, and to provide education property tax hardship relief under RSA 198:55, and to fund the education improvement fund established in RSA 193-G:4. The state treasurer shall deposit into [this] the education trust fund immediately upon receipt:

10 New Paragraph; State School Organization; State Board of Education Rulemaking Authority; Rules for Appeals. Amend RSA 186:8 by inserting after paragraph V the following new paragraph:

VI. Appeals from a school board on the matter of nonrenewal of teacher contracts, providing that the appeal to the state board of education shall be limited to the record developed at the school board hearing, except where the state board of education determines that new evidence is available which could not have been reasonably discovered at the time of the school board hearing and that such evidence may have materially affected the outcome of the school board hearing. In such cases, the state board of education shall render a final decision in the matter or remand it to the school board for a new hearing.

11 School Boards, Teachers; Teacher Renewal; Reference Amended. Amend RSA 189:14-a, II to read as follows:

II. Any teacher who has a professional standards certificate from the state board of education and who has taught for 3 consecutive years or more in any school district in the state shall, after having taught for 2 consecutive years in any other school district in the state, be entitled to all of the rights for notification and hearing in [paragraph I(b)] paragraphs I(b), III, and IV of this section.

12 New Paragraphs; School Boards, Teachers; Teacher Renewal; Nonrenomination Procedure. Amend RSA 189:14-a by inserting after paragraph II the following new paragraphs:

III. In cases of nonrenomination because of unsatisfactory performance, the superintendent of the local school district shall demonstrate, at the school board hearing, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the teacher had received written notice that the teacher's unsatisfactory performance may lead to nonrenomination, that the teacher had a reasonable opportunity to correct such unsatisfactory performance, and that the teacher had failed to correct such unsatisfactory performance. Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to require the superintendent or the school board to provide a teacher with remedial assistance to correct any deficiencies that form the basis for such teacher's nonrenomination.

IV. In all proceedings before the school board under this section, the burden of proof for nonrenewal of a teacher shall be on the superintendent of the local school district by a preponderance of the evidence.

13 School Boards, Teachers; Review by State Board of Education. Amend RSA 189:14-b to read as follows:

189:14-b Review by State Board.

I. A teacher aggrieved by such decision may request the state board of education for review thereof. Such request must be in writing and filed with the state board within 10 days after the issuance of the decision to be reviewed. Upon receipt of such request, the state board shall notify the school board of the request for review, and shall forthwith proceed to a consideration of the matter. Such consideration shall include a hearing if either party shall request it. The state board shall issue its decision within [15] 30 days after the request for review is filed, and the decision of the state board shall be final and binding upon both parties. A request for review under this section shall constitute the exclusive remedy available to a teacher on the issue of the nonrenewal of such teacher.

II. The state board of education shall uphold a decision of a local school board to nonrenew a teacher's contract unless the local school board's decision is clearly erroneous.

14 Public Employee Labor Relations; Grievance Procedures; Nonrenewal of Teacher Contract not Subject to Binding Arbitration. Amend RSA 273-A:4 to read as follows:

273-A:4 Grievance Procedures. Every agreement negotiated under the terms of this chapter shall be reduced to writing and shall contain workable grievance procedures. No grievance resulting from the failure of a teacher to be renewed pursuant to RSA 189:14-a, shall be subject to arbitration or any other binding resolution, except as provided by RSA 189:14-a and RSA 189:14-b. Any such provision in force as of the effective date of this section shall be null and void upon the expiration date of that collective bargaining agreement.

15 Repeal. RSA 194:23-d, relative to state financial aid, is repealed.

16 Effective Date. This act shall take effect July 1, 2001.

LBAO

01-0824

Revised 3/23/01

SB 164 FISCAL NOTE

AN ACT establishing a comprehensive statewide accountability system concerning an adequate education.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The Department of Education indicates this bill will increase state education trust fund expenditures by $2,908,145 in FY 2002, $2,940,135 in FY 2003, $3,049,390 in FY 2004 and $3,049,390 in FY 2005. Local revenue will increase by $2,443,145 in FY 2002, $1,980,135 in FY 2003, $2,049,390 in FY 2004 and $1,783,390 in FY 2005. There will be no fiscal impact on state and county revenue or county and local expenditures.

METHODOLOGY:

The Department calculated the amount it will transfer from the education trust fund to the education improvement fund by multiplying the adequate education cost estimate by one third of one percent or .0033. The Department assumes the entire amount will be expended as follows:

Personnel

The Department assumes it will hire the following employees in FY 2002:

One Administrator II, labor grade 30

Four Education Consultant I's, labor grade 25

One Administrative Secretary, labor grade 13

One Systems Development Specialist VI, labor grade 29

The Department assumes it will hire the following personnel in FY 2003:

Four Education Consultant I's, labor grade 25

One Grants and Contracts Technician, labor grade 14

One Secretary II, labor grade 8

Two Statistical Assistants, labor grade 13, part-time

Additional Expenses

The Department states it will spend additional amounts for ongoing costs associated with the reading assessment and to review performance standards.

Education Improvement Grants

The Department states it will use whatever funds remain in the education improvement fund after making the expenditures listed above to make these grants to local school districts.

FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005

One third of one percent (.0033)

of adequate education cost $2,908,145 $2,940,135 $3,049,390 $3,049,390

Personnel 465,000 860,000 895,000 931,000

Additional Expenses 0 100,000 105,000 335,000

Education Grants to Districts $2,443,145 $1,980,135 $2,049,390 $1,783,390

Total State Expenditures $2,908,145 $2,940,135 $3,049,390 $3,049,390