Priscilla Matos

As someone who works in the recovery field, I see firsthand how unregulated substances can quietly become major barriers to people trying to build stable, healthy lives. Kratom is often marketed as a natural or safe alternative, but in practice, we’re seeing more individuals struggle with dependence on it. Its opioid-like effects can create a false sense of security, especially for those already vulnerable to substance use disorders. What’s especially concerning is the complete lack of safeguards in New Hampshire. Right now, kratom is widely available at gas stations and convenience stores, with no age restrictions, no consistent labeling, and no real oversight. That means minors can access it easily, often without any understanding of the risks. In a field where we work hard to educate and protect young people, this gap is alarming. SB 557 is a step in the right direction. Establishing a 21+ age requirement helps limit youth access. Prohibiting packaging that targets children addresses the very real issue of products being marketed in ways that appeal to younger audiences. Requiring warning labels ensures that people are at least informed about potential risks, and mandating licensing creates a level of accountability for retailers. Banning synthetic versions is also critical, as those products can be especially dangerous and unpredictable. This bill doesn’t criminalize people—it creates structure and safety around a substance that is currently unchecked. From a recovery perspective, these kinds of guardrails matter. They help prevent new cases of dependency while supporting a broader culture of informed, responsible use and public health.