Cathy Stratton

As the State of New Hampshire begins to consider regulation of Artificial Intelligence, the New Hampshire Medical Society urges a thoughtful and measured approach. Artificial Intelligence is neither inherently good nor inherently harmful; its impact depends entirely on how it is developed, implemented, and overseen. Policymakers must be cautious in both its use and its regulation. The Medical Society is particularly concerned about the use of Artificial Intelligence—or AI-enabled tools—to alter, adjust, or override medical and clinical diagnoses. Artificial Intelligence must never be used administratively to supplant or modify a physician’s clinical judgment. Doing so would effectively constitute the practice of medicine and should remain the responsibility of a licensed provider. AI can play a constructive role in healthcare when used in a supportive capacity—enhancing efficiency, improving data analysis, and assisting clinical decision-making—while ensuring that patient safety, physician autonomy, and system integrity remain paramount. NHMS supports provisions that provide meaningful oversight, transparency, and ongoing monitoring of AI use and its real-world impact. We believe the Insurance Department’s role in overseeing implementation and evaluating potential unintended consequences is both appropriate and important. Thoughtful guardrails will help ensure that innovation strengthens, rather than undermines, the physician-patient relationship and the quality of care delivered in New Hampshire.