Teresa Lambert

This testimony is for the amendment to exclude any formal weight designation. 1. Unenforceable - NH does not have the resources to calculate or enforce weight. Other states, such as Maine has already learned this the hard way when they tried to get Registration Agents to use manufacturer-listed weight during registration. 2. The 65" width restrictions already limit weight based on physics. 3. "unlayden dry weight" is without engine fluids, accessories, persons, extra gas, and gear. (I take at least three versions of clothing for rain, cold, hot) 4. Heavy machines 4-6 seats, heater and air conditioning are already out on the trails now and have been for at least 5 years. 5. These larger 65" vehicles are driven by Moms, Dads, and Grandparents who are not "ripping it up" on the trails. 6. Manufacturers have been paying attention to complaints and are advancing tire and noise technology now. (variable tread, modifying engine operation) 7. Education - NH laws and regulations for OHRVing are very, very confusing for the riders. A coordinated effort between NHOHVA, OHRV Clubs, NH Fish&Game, Bureau of Trails is sorely needed. Having a weight limit at all opens a can of worms especialy if there can be no resource for enforcement. Many of the concerns are from those who don't have any experience with these trails and are making assumptions based on what they fear. These days, the biggest amount of trail damage comes from larger rainstorms, where water mitigation with trail maintenance is key. The OHRV community is self-funded and has the money for mitigation. I am speaking here as a Grandmother who has been a part of the OHRV community not only as a rider but a volunteer in the state association, the clubs, and even the national OHV community. Please consider this amendment to remove any weight destination for a more meaningful outcome. Thank you for your time and your dedication to New Hampshire!