Allison Lane

This bill undermines the very premise, and the Republican party's own sales pitch, for the school voucher program. If a voucher allows a family to remove their tax dollars from local public schools, they should not also be entitled to services at that school. You simply cannot have it both ways. If you want the extracurricular activities and instruction provided by a public school, you should send your child to that school. What is to stop people from taking the voucher, getting the money, and then keeping it while having their child's education primarily handled by the school that money was essentially taken from?