Elsie DiBella

I oppose NH HB 1062 because it represents an unnecessary and harmful change that undermines local control, creates unintended consequences, and shifts decision-making away from the communities most affected. New Hampshire has a strong tradition of thoughtful, locally informed governance, and this bill moves us in the opposite direction. HB 1062 would limit the ability of municipalities and local boards to make decisions that reflect the needs, priorities, and character of their own communities. One-size-fits-all mandates rarely work well in a state as diverse as New Hampshire, and this legislation risks overriding local expertise and accountability. Proponents have not demonstrated that existing law is insufficient or that the problem HB 1062 seeks to address cannot be handled through current processes. Significant statutory changes should be driven by clear evidence of need, not hypothetical concerns or isolated cases. HB 1062 sets a troubling precedent by centralizing authority and reducing transparency and public input. New Hampshire residents expect decisions that affect their daily lives to be made close to home, with opportunities for meaningful community engagement. For these reasons, I urge you to reject NH HB 1062 and instead pursue solutions that respect local decision-making, fiscal responsibility, and New Hampshire’s long-standing commitment to limited and responsive government.