B. Mason

Flags are important representation of identity. Symbolism is an important part of being an American. It is telling, therefore, that the ban of flags supporting international bodies, peace-keepers, allies to groups who have been historically marginalized (e.g., LGBTQIA groups), and so forth, are being considered for ban in this moment. Open flag display is about showing up, taking accountability for what you represent, and taking responsibility to openly appear to others. This is a right that many have fought for, and died for. It is a right to which other areas of this great nation are still fighting for. And it speaks to the mind of the committee that they are more concerned with isolating and removing this freedom than with being welcoming, understanding, or meeting the moment we are in with responsibility. Some may feel that my stance is "too political". However, every part of our lives are political. The lives of students, teachers, and their experiences are intertwined with politics. It is not just about the appearance of the flag in school or "signaling", either. Scientists have ample data suggesting that the presence of flags with welcoming meanings, like the Pride flag, lowers youth risk for suicide as well as makes them feel welcomed, for example. Openly supporting a charitable cause - the lives and well-being of others - is also deeply linked with flag displays. The exemptions are not sufficient; the wording of suggests that punishment can be applied arbitrarily and escalated rapidly. In a global world, where the United States of America must continue to defend itself, its allies, and freedoms, this bill echoes as another restriction on the freedom of expression to both students and educators. I strongly oppose this bill, and share my disdain for the motion to do this in the future.