Kathryn Bobay

I believe schools should be safe, welcoming environments for all students, regardless of background or identity. Marginalizing a group by banning its representation does not erase its existence; rather, it further isolates and “others” those individuals at a time when our society should be striving for unity, not exclusion. If one flag is prohibited, it raises important questions about consistency and precedent. Would this logic require the removal of all other flags—such as those displayed in world language or history classrooms, or the many cultural flags often seen in schools that celebrate students’ diverse backgrounds, as is the case in districts like Manchester? In these contexts, flags serve as representations of identity and culture, not as threats. A pride flag, similarly, is not a symbol of indoctrination but one of inclusion. Removing such symbols would further restrict educators’ ability to foster safe, supportive learning environments where students feel secure taking academic risks and developing into responsible, compassionate, and accepting adults. As both a parent and an educator with extensive experience in the field, I can confidently state that symbols of inclusion in my own classroom and in others I have visited have consistently provided reassurance, support, and encouragement for students. With respect and appreciation for your service, I strongly urge you to oppose this bill and any future legislation that would limit freedom of speech, expression, and the inclusion of all students.