Kristine Pelletier

Dear Members of the [House Education Committee / Relevant Committee], My name is Kristine Pelletier, I am testifying today in strong opposition to HB1803, which I understand would restrict or prohibit students from benefiting from both the Education Tax Credit (ETC) Scholarship and the Education Freedom Account (EFA) Grant—a change that would harm families like mine who rely on these complementary programs. Our family has personally experienced the transformative power of both programs. When our two children were struggling in their public-school environment—facing challenges that affected their academic progress, confidence, and overall well-being—we transferred them to a private school. My husband and I were able to make it work for the first year, however all of my pay went to tuition then we were able to turned to the ETC Scholarship for support. This privately funded program, supported by business donations that receive an 85% state tax credit, provided critical financial assistance (with awards typically around $3,000–$3,400 per student for the 2025-2026 year). This scholarship directly alleviated the burden of tuition, online programs, or other customized educational options, making a better-fitting education accessible without forcing us to stretch our family budget to the breaking point. The ETC scholarship benefited us financially in a profound way: it gave us the breathing room to choose an education we feel is far superior for our children's unique needs—through a more supportive and academically challenging private setting. Without this aid, we simply could not have afforded the opportunity for what we believe is a higher-quality, more personalized education that has helped our children thrive academically and emotionally. Building on that foundation, the EFA Grant later provided additional state-funded flexibility to cover ongoing expenses like supplies, classes, and technology—ensuring continued success. Together, these programs created a seamless pathway that started with targeted, need-based private support (ETC) and expanded into broader customization (EFA). Any legislation that would make students ineligible for one program if they receive the other would close off this vital bridge for many families. The ETC is modest in scope (capped at around $5.1 million annually, serving only about 1,700 students statewide), privately funded, and focused on students struggling in public schools—often from lower-income households. It complements the EFA without duplicating or overburdening state resources. Restricting dual access would disproportionately hurt the very families these programs were designed to help: those seeking alternatives due to unmet needs in traditional schools, but who lack the means to pay out-of-pocket. Our children's improved engagement, better grades, and renewed joy in learning are direct results of the financial relief and choices these programs provided. Please do not limit this opportunity for other New Hampshire families. I urge you to oppose HB1803 (or any similar restrictions) and preserve full access to both the ETC Scholarship and EFA Grant. These programs work—they deliver real, positive change for children and ease financial pressures for parents. Thank you for considering my family's story. I am available to answer questions or share more details. Kristine Pelletier 603-475-1927 kris1213@comcast.net