Georgina Lambert

Opposition Testimony for HB 1128 I oppose HB 1128, which seeks to restrict weather modification technologies, such as cloud seeding, to formally declared drought emergencies. While the bill claims to prioritize environmental oversight and transparency, its emergency-only framework fundamentally undermines proactive responses to the escalating climate crisis. By limiting weather modification practices solely to declared emergencies, this legislation may delay critical interventions that could mitigate devastating weather impacts on agriculture, water resources, and vulnerable communities. In a rapidly changing climate, the need for adaptive strategies is paramount, and restricting such technologies to emergencies signifies a reactive rather than proactive approach. Moreover, the provisions outlined in HB 1128, including a 14-day environmental review and centralized oversight, while well-intentioned, could create bureaucratic hurdles that impede timely action during climate crises. The focus on lengthy reviews and notice requirements may stifle innovative practices that can help communities adapt to and mitigate climate-related challenges. For populations already experiencing the stress of climate impacts, this delay could result in significant economic and social hardships. Rather than imposing restrictive measures, we should be encouraging flexible, science-based approaches to weather modification that enable timely and effective responses to meet the pressing needs of our environment and communities. This bill represents a missed opportunity to fully embrace the potential of technology in addressing climate-related challenges, ultimately failing to serve the best interests of New Hampshire’s residents and ecosystems.