bonnie bruno

I oppose this bill as written, not because transparency is bad, but because transparency that chills access to justice is not neutral. Under a ‘do no harm’ standard, legislation should not move forward without clear evidence of need and safeguards against unintended consequences—particularly for under-resourced plaintiffs. Transparency is important—but transparency that chills access to justice is not neutral. We should ensure this bill doesn’t unintentionally advantage powerful defendants or restrict the ability of ordinary people to bring legitimate claim