Britnie Prestage-Williamson

To Whom It May Concern,  I am writing to express my opposition to the bills that the State of New Hampshire is proposing regarding short-term rentals (STRs). Many STRs are owned by private individuals who use these properties primarily as personal vacation homes, yet they do not meet the definition of a second home, which requires the owner to occupy the property for at least six months out of the year.   I reside in the Lakes Region of New Hampshire, an area with a significant market for second homes and vacation rentals. This region is surrounded by beautiful lakes and mountains, attracting visitors for concerts, boating, hiking, skiing, and various other activities throughout the year. With limited hotel options available, STRs provide the primary means of accommodation for many vacationers who prefer the convenience of a home-like atmosphere during their stay.   For most investors in STRs, the financial gains are modest, and they largely rely on rental income to cover the property expenses when it is not in use for personal enjoyment. It is crucial to consider the impact that these proposed bills would have on vacationers; without available properties to rent, we may see a decline in the number of tourists visiting our state. This will not only affect STR owners but also all businesses that depend on vacationers to sustain their operations.   Should homeowners be forced to sell their properties due to these new regulations, we could see a significant drop in property values. This situation would create widespread economic challenges, affecting the entire state and the businesses that rely on tourism.  I urge you to consider the potential repercussions of these bills on our community and the economy as a whole.   Sincerely, Concerned Owner