Cheryl Hetzer-Keuenhoff

I opposed this bill because it’s taking the right of people who try to get into homeless for the first time and out of apartments or those who lost their homes to go back into a home environment. It’s not fair that the only available Homes are over $500,000 are not available to somebody like me a retired person or somebody like my daughter and her husband who can’t afford to even buy a home we’ll have to continuously live in an apartment. This is not about your right to profit, but our right to find a home and happiness in the state of New Hampshire and this is not what you are doing. This is totally against everything that a resident of New Hampshire is! Mobile homes from anything before 1980s are not the same as what is being built today and anybody who looks at some of these modular homes now as double wide or singles wide it’s totally different different than what was done then. They have different different codes. They have different different standards. This is not not fair to take away anyone’s right to be able to purchase or to be able to add in a town. It’s not fair when a town says that mobile homes can only be on a certain size lot and make it look like a slum just to be able to get rid of them. That’s not fair to anyone not the people who live beside them whatever, but if they were given the opportunity to have large larger, lots bigger place to expand a yard and have some of these modular homes come in it’s a whole different story today and a lot of different places. I will invite you to come take a look at someplace nice and that’s Freedom Hill Co-op in Loudon, New Hampshire? There are many co-ops in this state that are in a lot better shape than what some of the old places are, but they are nevertheless homes for somebody. It’s the landlords of the other properties or the combination of the co-op itself. That makes it better.