Eric Fletcher

To Whom It May Concern, I am writing to formally express my strong opposition to the proposed change reducing the Dig Safe response time from 72 hours to 48 hours. I have worked as a utility locator for over 15 years and have direct experience locating utilities in Vermont. Vermont previously operated under a 48-hour response time for many years and recently transitioned to a 72-hour requirement. Since this change, both contractors and utility locators have been able to work more efficiently, communicate more effectively, and, most importantly, reduce the number of damages and dig-ins. The 72-hour response time allows for better scheduling, more accurate locates, and improved coordination between all parties involved. Utility locating is not simply a matter of speed; it requires careful planning, record review, field verification, and clear communication. Rushing this process increases the likelihood of errors, which can lead to utility strikes, service disruptions, and serious safety risks. During peak construction months, particularly in the summer, the volume of work alone makes a 48-hour response time unrealistic. Forcing shorter deadlines under these conditions places undue strain on locating personnel and significantly increases the risk of missed or incomplete locates. Based on both my professional experience and the observed improvements following Vermont’s move to a 72-hour response time, I believe reducing the timeframe back to 48 hours would be a step backward. There is no clear benefit to this change, while the potential safety and operational risks are substantial. For these reasons, I strongly believe the Dig Safe response time should remain at 72 hours. Respectfully, Eric Fletcher