Rolf Zuk

This bill is just wrong. There is no scientific or engineering material that I have seen that backs the need for this bill. I welcome any input to what problems this bill addresses. This bill is a major infringement of my property rights. While I have no current intention to enroll my property in a carbon sequestration program, I do not believe this is the State of New Hampshire business to mandate plans that need to be submitted to the state, particularly when there is only broadly and ambiguous guidelines such as "The plan shall demonstrate adherence to best forestry practices." and "This component shall identify and address potential impacts to fish and wildlife habitat." I walk my property so see what needs to be done. In most cases I do what needs to be done. I know the deer, squirrels, the visiting moose, the rabbits and other fauna that live or visit my property. I do not want or desire to have the state anymore involved that they already are. Is this the best way to spend nearly a quarter of a million dollars per year? We have people living in the streets which seems to me a more urgent problem that could use more resources and will help people.