David Noyes

David C. Noyes Director of Public Safety Waterville Valley Department of Public Safety 14 TAC Lane Waterville Valley, NH 03215 dnoyes@waterviilevalleynh.gov (603)-236-8809 X307 03/10/2025 Subject: Opposition to NH House Bill 456 Dear House Legislative Administration Committee, I am writing to express my strong opposition to New Hampshire House Bill 456, which allows the legislature to micromanage local officials' speech and decision-making authority by limiting organizations to provide "information only" to the legislature. While I understand the intent to ensure that public funds are used responsibly, this bill would have significant unintended consequences that could hinder the ability of municipalities, school districts, and other public entities to effectively advocate for the needs of their communities. As a Director of Public Safety in the Town of Waterville Valley, I have seen firsthand how participation in legislative discussions allows municipalities and public entities to provide critical input on policies that directly impact local governance, public safety, education, and infrastructure. HB 456 would severely restrict these efforts by preventing the use of public funds for any activity that could be deemed as lobbying or legislative influence, thereby silencing the voices of those responsible for implementing state laws and policies at the local level. Key concerns regarding HB 456 include: 1. Hindrance to Effective Advocacy: Municipalities, school boards, and public agencies rely on professional associations to represent their interests in Concord. These groups ensure that local governments have a seat at the table when decisions affecting public safety, education, and municipal operations are made. Eliminating this ability would leave local governments at a disadvantage compared to well-funded private interest groups. 2. Unintended Legal and Financial Consequences: The bill introduces significant penalties, including potential personal financial liability and criminal charges for those authorizing expenditures deemed in violation of the law. This creates an environment of fear and uncertainty, discouraging public officials from engaging in necessary discussions with legislators. 3. Overly Broad and Restrictive Language: The bill’s vague language regarding what constitutes lobbying or political activity could have a chilling effect on routine governmental operations. Even providing legislators with factual information about the local impacts of proposed legislation could be construed as lobbying, potentially leading to penalties. 4. Local Control and Decision-Making: Local governments and school districts should have the autonomy to use public funds to best serve their communities. HB 456 undermines local decision-making by imposing a one-size-fits-all restriction that fails to recognize the complexity of municipal governance. 5. Negative Impact on Public Services: By restricting municipalities' ability to engage in legislative advocacy, this bill could lead to laws and regulations that do not fully consider local needs, ultimately harming residents, students, and public safety. I urge you to oppose HB 456 and support the ability of public entities to responsibly engage with the legislative process. Ensuring that local voices are heard in Concord is essential to maintaining effective governance and responsive policymaking. Thank you for your time and consideration. I would welcome the opportunity to discuss this matter further at your convenience. Sincerely, David C. Noyes Director of Public Safety Waterville Valley Department of Public Safety