Jessica Cann

Testimony in Opposition to HB232 Dear House of Representatives, I am writing to express my strong opposition to HB232, which would allow health care providers to refuse to participate in providing abortion, sterilization, or artificial contraception services based on conscientious objection. While I respect individual beliefs, this bill prioritizes the personal convictions of providers over the fundamental rights and medical needs of patients, creating significant barriers to essential health care. Access to reproductive health services is a fundamental aspect of comprehensive health care. By permitting providers to deny these services, this bill places unnecessary burdens on patients—particularly those in rural areas, low-income communities, and marginalized populations—who may have limited access to alternative providers. The result will be increased health risks, delayed care, and undue hardship for individuals seeking time-sensitive medical services. Furthermore, the requirement for health care institutions to prominently post a notice of conscientious objection may create an environment of stigma and intimidation, deterring patients from seeking care even when legally entitled to it. It also raises concerns about discrimination, as refusals of care may disproportionately affect individuals based on gender, socioeconomic status, or personal circumstances. Health care providers have a professional and ethical obligation to prioritize patient well-being. While personal beliefs should be respected, they should not take precedence over a patient’s right to receive necessary medical care. Allowing broad refusal rights without ensuring timely referrals or alternative access to care places ideology above public health, setting a dangerous precedent. I urge you to reject HB232 and instead focus on legislation that ensures all individuals have access to safe, comprehensive, and equitable health care. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Jessica Cann